What Brett Kavanaugh wrote about impeachment in Starr Report

moncler outlet online President Trump has nominated to the Supreme Court a man who once co wrote a cheap moncler coats report saying a president who lies, even if not under oath, could be impeached. moncler outlet online

That’s a vast oversimplification of Brett Kavanaugh’s role in drafting the 1998 Starr Report, which laid out grounds for impeaching President Bill Clinton that included lying to his staff and the American people. But it’s strictly accurate. And given that Trump has now nominated Kavanaugh, it presents Democrats with a chance to pepper him with questions about an uncomfortable topic for Trump.

moncler outlet jackets Whether that actually gets them anywhere is a different question. Kavanaugh confronted some similar queries in his 2004 confirmation hearing for moncler outlet sale his appeals court seat, and he didn’t budge. “It was not our place to say what the House should do with that or what the Senate should do with that evidence,” he said when pressed by Sen. moncler outlet jackets

moncler sale Kavanaugh also stressed back then as his allies and some legal scholars emphasize now that we shouldn’t assume that every ground for impeachment listed was tantamount to Kavanaugh or anybody else saying Clinton should have been impeached for those things. He said they were possible grounds “based on history and historical practice.” moncler sale

moncler outlet sale Given the questions that are moncler outlet store probably headed his way, though, we thought it worth parsing and annotating exactly what the Starr Report says especially the areas that could be moncler sale outlet applicable to Trump’s case. Below are relevant sections on grounds for impeachment, to which Kavanaugh said in 2004 that he contributed. And a quick disclaimer for anyone who has forgotten the late 1990s: This includes some graphic sexual references. moncler outlet sale

Introduction Cheap Moncler Pursuant to Section 595(c) of Title 28, the Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) hereby submits substantial and credible information that President Clinton obstructed justice during the Jones v. Clinton sexual harassment lawsuit by lying under oath and concealing evidence of his relationship with a young White House intern and federal employee, Monica Lewinsky. After a federal criminal investigation of the President’s actions began in January 1998, the President lied under oath to the grand jury and obstructed justice during the grand cheap moncler jury investigation.

cheap moncler coats There is substantial and credible information supporting the following eleven possible grounds for impeachment: cheap moncler coats

President Clinton lied under oath in his civil case when he denied a sexual affair, a sexual relationship, or sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. President Clinton lied under oath to the grand jury about his sexual relationship moncler outlet with Ms. Lewinsky. In his civil deposition, to support his false statement about the sexual relationship, President Clinton also lied under cheap moncler outlet oath about being alone with Ms. Lewinsky and about the many gifts exchanged between Ms. Lewinsky and him. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition about his discussions with Ms. Lewinsky concerning her involvement in the Jones case. During the Jones case, the President obstructed justice and had an understanding with Ms. Lewinsky to jointly conceal the truth about their relationship by concealing gifts subpoenaed by Ms. Jones’s attorneys. During the Jones case, the President obstructed justice and had an understanding with Ms. Lewinsky to jointly conceal the truth of their relationship from the judicial process by a scheme that included the following means: (i) Both the President and Ms. Lewinsky understood that they would lie under oath in the Jones case about their sexual relationship; (ii) the President suggested to Ms. Lewinsky that she prepare an affidavit that, for the President’s purposes, would memorialize her testimony under oath and could be used to prevent questioning of both of them about their relationship; (iii) Ms. Lewinsky signed and filed the false affidavit; (iv) the President used Ms. Lewinsky’s false affidavit at his deposition in an attempt to head off questions about Ms. Lewinsky; and (v) when that failed, the President lied under oath at his civil deposition about the relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice by helping Ms. Lewinsky obtain moncler sale a job in New York at a time when she would have been a witness harmful to him were she to tell the truth in the Jones case. President Clinton lied under oath in his civil deposition about his discussions with Vernon Jordan concerning Ms. Lewinsky’s involvement in the Jones case. The President moncler outlet online improperly tampered with a potential witness by attempting to corruptly influence the testimony of his personal secretary, Betty Currie, in the days after his civil deposition. President Clinton endeavored to obstruct justice during the grand jury investigation by refusing to testify for seven months and lying to senior White House aides with knowledge that they would relay the President’s false statements to the grand jury and did thereby deceive, obstruct, and impede the grand jury. Lewinsky; (ii) promising at that time to cooperate fully with the grand jury investigation; (iii) later refusing six invitations to testify voluntarily to the grand jury; (iv) invoking Executive Privilege; (v) lying to the grand jury in August 1998; and (vi) lying again to the public and Congress on cheap moncler sale August 17, 1998 all as part of an effort to hinder, impede, and deflect possible inquiry by the Congress of the United States. The first two possible grounds for impeachment concern the President’s lying under oath about the nature of his relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. The details associated with those grounds are, by their nature, explicit.

In a meeting with Betty Currie on the day after his deposition and in a separate conversation a few days later, President Clinton made statements to her that he knew were false. The contents of the statements and the context in which they were made indicate that President Clinton was attempting to influence the testimony buy moncler jackets that Ms. Currie might have been required to give in the Jones case or in a grand jury investigation.(385)

A. Evidence

1. Saturday, January 17, 1998, Deposition

moncler sale outlet President https://www.moncleroutletmall.com Clinton’s deposition in Jones v. Clinton occurred on Saturday, January 17, 1998. In that deposition, the President testified moncler mens jackets that he could not recall being alone with Monica Lewinsky and that he had not had sexual relations, a sexual affair, or a sexual relationship with her. During his testimony, the President referred several times to Betty Currie and to her relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. He stated, for example, that the last time he had seen Ms. Lewinsky was when she had come to the White House to see Ms. Currie;(386) that Ms. Currie was present when the President had made a joking reference about the Jones case to Ms. Lewinsky;(387) that Ms. Currie was his source of information about Vernon Jordan’s assistance to Ms. Lewinsky;(388) and that Ms. Currie had helped set up the meetings between Ms. Lewinsky and Mr. Jordan regarding her move to New York.(389) moncler sale outlet

moncler factory outlet At the deposition, Judge Wright imposed a protective order that prevented the parties from discussing their testimony with anyone else. “Before he leaves, I want to remind him, as the witness in this matter,… that this case is subject to a Protective Order regarding all discovery,… [A]ll parties present, including… the witness are not to say anything whatsoever about the questions they were asked, the substance of the deposition,…, any details….”(390) moncler factory outlet

2. Sunday, January 18, 1998, Meeting with Ms. Currie

moncler outlet uk Because the President referred so often to Ms. Currie, it was foreseeable that she might become a witness in the Jones matter, particularly if specific allegations of the President’s relationship with Ms. Lewinsky came to light.(391) Indeed, according to Ms. on Saturday, January 17, 1998, two and a half hours after cheap moncler jackets he returned from the deposition, President Clinton called Ms. Currie at home(393) and asked her to come to the White House the next day.(394) Ms. on Sunday, January 18, Ms. Currie went to meet with President Clinton at the White House. She told the grand jury: moncler outlet uk

moncler outlet store He said that he had had his deposition yesterday, and they had asked several questions about Monica Lewinsky. And I was a little shocked by that or (shrugging). And he said I don’t know if he said I think he may have said, “There are several things you may want to know,” or “There are things ” He asked me some questions.(396) moncler outlet store

cheap moncler outlet According to Ms. Currie, the President then said to her in succession:(397) cheap moncler outlet

“You were always there when she was there, right? We were never really alone.”(398)

moncler outlet “You could see and hear everything.”(399) moncler outlet

moncler jacket sale “Monica came on to me, and I never touched her, right?”(400) moncler jacket sale

moncler jackets outlet “She wanted to have sex with me, and I can’t do that.”(401) moncler jackets outlet

cheap moncler jackets sale Ms. Currie indicated that these remarks were “more like statements than questions.”(402) Ms. Currie concluded that the President wanted her to agree with him.(403) She based that conclusion on the way he made most of the statements and on his demeanor.(404) Ms. Currie also said that she felt the President made these remarks to see her reaction.(405) cheap moncler jackets sale

Ms. Currie said that she indicated her agreement with each of the President’s statements,(406) although she knew that the President and Ms. Lewinsky had in fact been alone in the Oval Office and in the President’s study.(407) Ms. Currie also knew that she could not or did not in fact hear or see the President and Ms. Lewinsky while they were alone.(408)

cheap moncler jackets In the context of this conversation, President Clinton appeared to be “concerned,” according to Ms. Currie.(409) cheap moncler jackets.